谷姐靓号网- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superbench.sh -- https://www.oldking.net/350.html
Mode: Standard Version : 1.1.7
Usage : wget -qO- sb.oldking.net | bash
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 [url=home.php?mod=space&uid=175]@[/url] 2.50GHz
CPU Cores : 3 Cores 2499.998 MHz x86_64
CPU Cache : 4096 KB
OS : Ubuntu 16.04.7 LTS (64 Bit) KVM
Kernel : 4.4.0-109-generic
Total Space : 1.6 GB / 25.0 GB
Total RAM : 29 MB / 1874 MB (721 MB Buff)
Total SWAP : 0 MB / 255 MB
Uptime : 0 days 23 hour 45 min
Load Average : 0.32, 0.08, 0.03
TCP CC : cubic
ASN & ISP : AS36352, ColoCrossing
Organization : Virtual Machine Solutions LLC
Location : Tukwila, United States / US
Region : Washington
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 219 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 666 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 655 MB/s
Average I/O Speed : 513.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 114.86 Mbit/s 837.75 Mbit/s (*)56.88 ms
Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 65.6 Mbit/s -
Nanjing 5G CT249.43 Mbit/s 460.99 Mbit/s 170.80 ms
Hefei 5G CT1.67 Mbit/s 461.50 Mbit/s 180.26 ms
Guangzhou 5G CT21.42 Mbit/s 10.99 Mbit/s 191.89 ms
TianJin 5G CU450.69 Mbit/s 575.81 Mbit/s 186.29 ms
Shanghai 5GCU732.12 Mbit/s 474.75 Mbit/s 216.95 ms
Guangzhou 5G CU450.73 Mbit/s 762.88 Mbit/s 190.45 ms
Tianjin 5G CM501.48 Mbit/s 794.86 Mbit/s 218.02 ms
Nanjing 5G CM572.41 Mbit/s 60.63 Mbit/s 225.46 ms
Changsha 5GCM401.94 Mbit/s 447.88 Mbit/s 220.17 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in: 6 min 1 sec
Timestamp : 2021-09-16 22:23:57 GMT+8
Results : ./superbench.log
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Share result:
· https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/05283137-1daa-4297-bf5c-b3db314f1204
· https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/cBfMKrW6Zg/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- ========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: ShorttermMetallic-VM: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.4.0-109-generic -- #132-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 9 19:52:39 UTC 2018
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
16:54:00 up1:21,1 user,load average: 1.49, 2.28, 2.03; runlevel 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 15 2021 16:54:00 - 17:22:11
3 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 27704691.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3543.0 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1788.3 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 474616.1 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 126702.2 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1171905.7 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 818441.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 32380.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4561.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6026.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1803.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 672679.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 27704691.7 2374.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3543.0 644.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 1788.3 415.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 474616.1 1198.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 126702.2 765.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1171905.7 2020.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 818441.9 657.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 32380.8 81.0
Process Creation 126.0 4561.5 362.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6026.0 1421.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1803.0 3005.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 672679.0 448.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 770.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Sep 15 2021 17:22:11 - 17:50:24
3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 81303857.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10470.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7967.3 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 791273.5 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 208476.1 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2225401.7 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2380747.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 223940.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 17691.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 15864.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2007.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1940607.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 81303857.1 6966.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10470.1 1903.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 7967.3 1852.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 791273.5 1998.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 208476.1 1259.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2225401.7 3836.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2380747.8 1913.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 223940.1 559.9
Process Creation 126.0 17691.4 1404.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 15864.4 3741.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2007.8 3346.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1940607.8 1293.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2058.3
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
热议
2楼 hapa 昨天22:28
不错
3楼 whiler 昨天22:30
3 核 2058 分，做站应该够了
4楼 bigcat 昨天22:31
what's up! unixbench的分数简直无敌
5楼 citywar 昨天22:38
我之前买的西雅图 测速好像 没这么高 怀疑 促销结束就会降下来
6楼 yylx 昨天22:41
我之前买的西雅图 测速好像 没这么高 怀疑 促销结束就会降下来
感觉重点不在测速，毕竟买3H1.8G的人应该不是用来fq的……
7楼 yylx 9小时前
确实挺高的……
8楼 wltc2005 9小时前
没忍住也买了西雅图2H1.75G，现在就但心他跑路
9楼 Shiba 8小时前
网速这么高... 买的达拉斯小鸡测速国内地区就几十Mbit/s
10楼 ricehl 2小时前
昨天又买了个3h3g的拿来做站，目前不晓得做什么类型，估计要吃灰了。
申明：本文内容由网友收集分享，仅供学习参考使用。如文中内容侵犯到您的利益，请在文章下方留言，本站会第一时间进行处理。
评论前必须登录！
立即登录 注册