谷姐靓号网剩余价值244元改邮箱出。
跑分：
国外：
- # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
# Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
# v2020-12-29 #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
Tue May 18 15:29:56 CEST 2021
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor: AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor
CPU cores: 4 @ 2799.998 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 7.8 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 196.7 GiB
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ----| ---- ----
Read | 5.29 MB/s (1.3k) | 63.95 MB/s (999)
Write | 5.31 MB/s (1.3k) | 64.37 MB/s (1.0k)
Total | 10.61 MB/s (2.6k) | 128.33 MB/s (2.0k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ----| ---- ----
Read | 127.52 MB/s (249) | 97.37 MB/s (95)
Write | 134.30 MB/s (262) | 103.85 MB/s (101)
Total | 261.83 MB/s (511) | 201.23 MB/s (196)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 183 Mbits/sec | 149 Mbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | busy | 197 Mbits/sec
WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | busy | busy
Biznet | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G) | 172 Mbits/sec | 108 Mbits/sec
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 177 Mbits/sec | 128 Mbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 169 Mbits/sec | 177 Mbits/sec
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 173 Mbits/sec | 183 Mbits/sec
Iveloz Telecom| Sao Paulo, BR (2G) | 156 Mbits/sec | 135 Mbits/sec
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 719
Multi Core | 2299
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/7956126
复制代码
国内：
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor
CPU Cores : 4
CPU Frequency : 2799.998 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
Total Disk : 196.9 GB (8.1 GB Used)
Total Mem : 7982 MB (3876 MB Used)
Total Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 15 days, 17 hour 29 min
Load average : 0.08, 0.11, 0.09
OS : CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 4.11.8-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
TCP CC : nanqinlang
Virtualization : KVM
Organization : AS51167 Contabo GmbH
Location : Munich / DE
Region : Bavaria
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 167 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 106 MB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 106 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 126.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 186.78 Mbps 197.57 Mbps 0.23 ms
Shanghai CT 153.79 Mbps 49.12 Mbps 229.70 ms
Shanghai CU 148.24 Mbps 213.16 Mbps 225.35 ms
GuangzhouCT 47.21 Mbps 169.09 Mbps 219.62 ms
Shenzhen CU 161.64 Mbps 204.76 Mbps 252.35 ms
Hongkong CN 172.98 Mbps 205.27 Mbps 200.54 ms
SingaporeSG 147.53 Mbps 43.61 Mbps 345.65 ms
Tokyo JP 180.74 Mbps 205.43 Mbps 224.60 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue May 18 2021 11:54:23 - 12:23:25
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 32913226.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3325.9 MWIPS (15.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4339.0 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 817595.7 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 249413.0 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1830463.2 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1652212.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 40655.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6967.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6335.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1646.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2024155.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 32913226.6 2820.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3325.9 604.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 4339.0 1009.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 817595.7 2064.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 249413.0 1507.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1830463.2 3156.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1652212.7 1328.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 40655.5 101.6
Process Creation 126.0 6967.1 552.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6335.9 1494.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1646.1 2743.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2024155.4 1349.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1175.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue May 18 2021 12:23:25 - 12:52:22
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 119329459.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 16022.3 MWIPS (12.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 11766.5 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 839371.4 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 220347.0 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2324534.1 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 6006437.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 618709.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21925.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13288.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2283.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4812054.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0119329459.310225.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 16022.3 2913.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 11766.5 2736.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 839371.4 2119.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 220347.0 1331.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2324534.1 4007.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 6006437.6 4828.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 618709.6 1546.8
Process Creation 126.0 21925.4 1740.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13288.0 3134.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2283.1 3805.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4812054.5 3208.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2963.2
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
复制代码
热议
2楼 【bgk77】 AMD YES ！
3楼 【shunglay】
必须的！
4楼 【KuaiKan】
AMD Yes!
5楼 【gordonbennett】 这家能ddwin吗
6楼 【shunglay】
7楼 【StopDriving】
逮住罚款
8楼 【shunglay】
这个还真不清楚喔，我是开发测试用，不折腾
9楼 【MSN】 Single Core 是单核跑分吗
10楼 【shunglay】
是的
12楼 【sdqu】
这么拉跨，我还特地看了一下，是不是眼花了你是发的PR的数字。。。
13楼 【shunglay】
you happy you ok
14楼 【没有的】
amd和intel这两个哪个好
15楼 【sdqu】
一个跑分400多，一个跑分700多。
当然是amd yes
16楼 【shunglay】
肯定amd啊
17楼 【没有的】
不是说现在选择amd的多吗？intel空闲了用的人少实际使用反而比amd要好，你是说吗？
18楼 【sdqu】
但事实就是，你的跑分，amd的远远好过intel啊。
如果amd跑的人多，跑分也就下来了。
19楼 【没有的】
两者之间在哪些使用上有较大的区别？
20楼 【sdqu】
普通使用没区别。
就是amd跑得快点核多点，intel慢点核少点。
所以，通常主机商会在amd上多开几个小鸡，然后就差不多拉平了。
不过你上面的数字，amd上的小鸡还不够多，所以比intel还是有点优势，但早晚会拉平的。
评论前必须登录！
立即登录 注册