Unixbench Version 5.1.3
单核 1650.2
四核 3347.7
- 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 35621720.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6595.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4154.6 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 994704.2 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 290029.3 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2645061.6 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1805685.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 104561.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9568.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10599.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2861.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2509209.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 35621720.4 3052.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6595.0 1199.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 4154.6 966.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 994704.2 2511.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 290029.3 1752.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2645061.6 4560.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1805685.5 1451.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 104561.3 261.4
Process Creation 126.0 9568.5 759.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10599.2 2499.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2861.1 4768.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2509209.0 1672.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1650.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 137645974.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 25921.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 11498.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 676129.3 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 206838.5 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2019425.9 KBps(30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 7129829.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 638789.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 24852.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 22807.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3389.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4905364.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0137645974.111794.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 25921.7 4713.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 11498.8 2674.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 676129.3 1707.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 206838.5 1249.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2019425.9 3481.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 7129829.8 5731.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 638789.9 1597.0
Process Creation 126.0 24852.2 1972.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 22807.6 5379.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3389.6 5649.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4905364.0 3270.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3347.7
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
YABS测试
- # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
# Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
# v2021-06-05 #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor: AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core Processor
CPU cores: 4 @ 1996.249 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 15.6 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 314.9 GiB
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ----| ---- ----
Read | 73.32 MB/s (18.3k) | 1.07 GB/s (16.7k)
Write | 73.51 MB/s (18.3k) | 1.07 GB/s (16.8k)
Total | 146.83 MB/s(36.7k) | 2.15 GB/s (33.6k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ----| ---- ----
Read | 1.60 GB/s (3.1k) | 1.55 GB/s (1.5k)
Write | 1.69 GB/s (3.3k) | 1.66 GB/s (1.6k)
Total | 3.30 GB/s (6.4k) | 3.21 GB/s (3.1k)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.83 Gbits/sec| 2.37 Gbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | busy | busy
WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 1.96 Gbits/sec| 2.38 Gbits/sec
Biznet | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G) | 429 Mbits/sec | 82.8 Mbits/sec
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 390 Mbits/sec | 1.68 Gbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 519 Mbits/sec | 1.99 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 388 Mbits/sec | 993 Mbits/sec
Iveloz Telecom| Sao Paulo, BR (2G) | 177 Mbits/sec | 880 Mbits/sec
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.42 Gbits/sec| 2.33 Gbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 1.50 Gbits/sec| 1.86 Gbits/sec
WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 1.46 Gbits/sec| 2.34 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 574 Mbits/sec | 1.67 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 443 Mbits/sec | 1.11 Gbits/sec
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 890
Multi Core | 2762
--------------更新--------------
好了，没事了
我NAS上的AMD 1500X，用PVE开了4核小鸡的Unixbench：
单核 2113.9
四核 4146.5
热议
推荐楼 ApkB 昨天20:21
RS系列是独享CPU，不应该啊
独享？太天真了，你以为杜甫啊
你算算如果实现真正意义上的独享，
那么每核心的成本会有多高，
算力在虚拟化中是共享得最彻底的
还有点反对的，那就自己去了解下KVM虚拟化技术吧
看看KVM虚拟化本质是什么，CPU的调度模式，还独享CPU，呵呵
2楼 ApkB 昨天20:12
没想法，这东西会动态变化
3楼 无神通 昨天20:16
没想法，这东西会动态变化
RS系列是独享CPU，不应该啊
5楼 3333 昨天20:21
挺高了
6楼 citywar 昨天20:24
看起来也差不多 斯巴达 contabo netcup这个跑分相差不大。
主要还是硬盘的分差别多
7楼 yanzhiling2001 昨天20:46
4 dedizierte Kerne 就这个跑分么，这款年付才14欧元每月呢，咋还比contabo 12刀的逊色点
8楼 我是坏虫 昨天20:47
小鸡就别奢望了
9楼 hey-free 昨天20:51
GOD 我正计划要采购呢 这样的话还不如买 Contabo的VPS了
PS: 我对带宽口子没太高要求的
10楼 skyland 昨天21:11
GOD 我正计划要采购呢 这样的话还不如买 Contabo的VPS了
PS: 我对带宽口子没太高要求的 ...
肯定还是要比 VPS 好，如果有项目的话。
12楼 hey-free 昨天21:20
有个企业项目要做 就怕比VPS贵 买来却只能当VPS用了
16楼 hey-free 1小时前
独享？太天真了，你以为杜甫啊
你算算如果实现真正意义上的独享，
那么每核心的成本会有多高，
那KVM跟 OpenStack的云主机比？
18楼 sky21022 半小时前
观望这两个商家
19楼 ApkB 半小时前
那KVM跟 OpenStack的云主机比？
你去看过netcup家的产品吗？
RS系列全部是KVM虚拟化，人家自己写着的
怎么就成KVM跟OpenStack去比了？
另外，一看你就外行了，KVM只是一种虚拟化技术；
而OpenStack是一套云计算管理平台，具体概念性的内容自己去学习吧
20楼 ApkB 28分钟前
人家通篇都只是说了保证RAM和CPU资源，到了你们这就成了CPU独享。
申明：本文内容由网友收集分享，仅供学习参考使用。如文中内容侵犯到您的利益，请在文章下方留言，本站会第一时间进行处理。